Record
I bought a same-day put and a next-day put on the same view — one finished at −17%, the other at −100%
Same day, same direction, same reasoning. Only the expiry differed. One day's record.
Buying same-day (0DTE) options looks appealing. They are cheap, and when you are right they go up several times over.
I thought so too. Which is why I wrote myself a rule yesterday.
"When I buy a single option, I do not use same-day expiry. Time decay is too steep."
I broke it the next day. Here is what that cost, in numbers.
It turned into a controlled experiment by accident
I expected the index to fall, so I bought two puts. Same morning, same directional read, same reasoning.
One thing differed: the expiry.
| Expiry | Entry → exit | Result | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7,700 put | next day (1DTE) | 21.10 → 17.60 | −17% |
| 7,670 put | same day (0DTE) | 4.60 → 0 | −100% |
The direction was right. The index did fall, and the close landed where my morning thesis said it would.
The same-day put still went to zero.
Why they split like that
An option's price has two parts.
| What it is | At expiry | |
|---|---|---|
| Intrinsic value | what exercising right now actually leaves you | it stays |
| Time value | the value of "there is still time, it could get there" | it goes to zero |
An out-of-the-money option is entirely time value. Its intrinsic value is zero.
So a same-day out-of-the-money option leaves nothing behind if price does not reach the strike by the close. Whether the direction was right does not enter into it. Only arrival does.
The next-day put had another day. Even with the direction right and price not yet at the strike, there was still time value left to sell into. That is why exiting at −17% was possible at all.
⚠️ "It's cheap, so the downside is small" is the trap
The 7,670 put cost 4.60. The 7,700 put cost 21.10. Much cheaper.
It looked cheap. It was cheap for a reason.
cheap = the market did not think price would get there
= low probability of arrival
= and no time left either
Two things stack. Low probability, and no time to be wrong in.
The session's actual low was 7,688.63 — 18 points short of 7,670. The direction was right, the distance was not, and expiry was that same day, so there was no time to wait.
Entry time made it worse
I bought that put at 06:33 (PT) — right at the open.
There is a common misreading here. "Same-day options are cheap because there is barely any time left" is a late-session statement.
Buying at the open means buying six and a half hours of time value that is about to melt. You pay the most expensive time value there is, then watch it drain all day.
So is same-day expiry always bad? No — the structure is what differs
This is not a case for avoiding 0DTE. The same day, I ran credit spreads on same-day expiry and those finished profitable.
The difference is whether time is on my side or not.
| As time passes | |
|---|---|
| Long a single option | the value shrinks. Time is the enemy |
| Short the option (credit) | that shrinking is the gain. Time is the ally |
| A butterfly and similar structures | the debit is a fixed maximum loss, and the wings carry value on the approach |
Same-day expiry is not the risk. "Same-day expiry and long a single" is. It is the combination where time turns against the position fastest.
So my rule changed
Yesterday I wrote this.
When I buy a single option, I do not use same-day expiry
Today I rewrote it.
I do not buy same-day single calls or puts. No exceptions.
I removed the room for exceptions for one reason. Yesterday's rule left room, and I walked out through that room in a single day.
What the lesson cost
The day's total loss was −$345. This one position lost −$460.
realized P&L for the day −$345
the same-day put alone −$460
────────────────────────────────────────
without that one position +$115
Breaking the rule cost more than the entire day's loss. Following it would have made the day profitable.
What I do not know yet
- The sample is one position. The numbers above are one day's record, not a statistic. I have never measured the expected value of same-day long singles.
- That said, time value going to zero at expiry is not a statistic — it is the definition of the contract. That part needs no sample.
- What I do not know is whether there are conditions under which a same-day long single is favorable anyway. If there are, I have not found them yet.
This is a record of option time decay and of my own trading rule. It is not a recommendation to trade any security, strike, or structure. The sample is one day. Your decisions and their outcomes are your own.
How was this to follow?
Knowing where it got hard is what lets me fix the next one. No name, no email.
Get the One-Page Options Field Guide
A strategy selector for bull, bear, and sideways markets, a pre-order checklist, and a glossary.
If this was useful
Why gamma, call walls, and put walls behave the way they do comes down to the structure of the options market. These books lay out that structure in order.
- Strategic US Options Trading I: Fundamentals — Start here if options are new — from reading the chain
- Strategic US Options Trading II: Strategies — When you want to actually place the order
- Strategic US Options Trading III: Advanced Strategies — When you want cash flow in a sideways market
Earlier posts live on Tistory. I'm moving them here a few at a time. optiontrading.tistory.com
Questions?
There are no comments or a guestbook here. Email me with questions about a post or to report an error — I read and reply. I don't give individual investment advice.
hello@optionphoenix.com